Release date: 2017-10-27 According to foreign media Telegraph, a recent study shows that human doctors still outperform "machine doctors" in surgery. Compared with robots, human doctors have shorter time to complete the operation and the turnover rate is not high. Since the first "machine doctor" in the UK a decade ago, the implementation of robotic surgery has been constantly rising. Surgical robots have been playing an increasingly important role in prostatectomy, cystectomy, nephrectomy, or in tumor resection. According to people's common understanding, it is certainly more accurate, more skilled and faster to have surgical robots to perform surgery. However, a recent study has revealed a diametrically opposite conclusion: for patients, surgery The machine doctor's "fencing" will not only improve the treatment effect on them, but will also make the operation time longer. Researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine, which led the study, collected information on 25,000 operations performed in 416 hospitals in the United States between 2006 and 2012. They found that only 28% of all patients who underwent minimally invasive nephrectomy with a human surgeon experienced more than 4 hours of surgery. In contrast, nearly 46% of all patients undergoing "machine doctor" surgery stayed under the scalpel for more than 4 hours. Benjamin Chung, an associate professor of urology at Stanford University, said: "We found that although there were no statistical differences in surgical outcomes and length of hospital stay, there was a higher cost of surgery involving robots. The possibility of time is also higher." Currently, there are approximately 60 “Da Vinci Robots†in the UK hospital system, which provide robot-assisted surgical services. Each Da Vinci Robot costs about £1 million (approximately $8.714 million) and these surgical robots offer 3D enhanced surgical images and special medical instruments such as miniature cameras and micro tools. These researchers at Stanford University also said that robots are no doubt helpful in some fine surgery, which requires a higher level of careful operation or an expandable internal suture operation. But the new study suggests that human surgeons are likely to perform better for surgical procedures that are not technically difficult, such as removing the entire kidney. Although these researchers also said that the time required for robots to perform surgery will become shorter over time, the cost gap between human doctors and "machine doctors" to perform surgery will also be shortened, but in the current situation, the results of the study It has been shown that robotic assisted surgery is not always the best choice for patients. “Everyone will definitely have this impulse, I want to use the most expensive medical equipment,†Dr. Chung added. "But it is also important to maintain rational consumption. We should know how to spend money on saving money." “Although there are some advantages to having the robot perform the surgery, but these advantages really can convince us that these extra money is really worth it?†Source: NetEase Technology Erlenmeyer Flasks,Borosilicate Erlenmeyer Flasks,Borosilicate Glass Erlenmeyer Flask,Borosilicate Glass Conical Flask Yancheng Rongtai Labware Co.,Ltd , https://www.shtestlab.com